The same input parameters mb(SF) and mupi used for the fit to all the independent analyses are used. In this case we just look at (mx-q2) analyses.
|Vub| (BLNP) for the (mX-q2) analyses | ||||
Experiment | Value [10-3] | Parameters | References | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|
BELLE breco (m_{X}, q^{2}) | 4.52 +/- 0.39 +/- 0.38 | input | Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 (hep-ex/0505088) | mX-q2, BRECO tag |
BELLE sim. ann. (m_{X}, q^{2}) | 4.23 +/- 0.45 +/- 0.36 | input | Phys.Rev.Lett.92:101801,2004 (hep-ex/0311048) | mX - Q2, tag with annealing method |
BABAR (m_{X}, q^{2}) | 4.34 +/- 0.28 +/- 0.36 | input | [arXiv:0708.3702v1] | mX-q2, BRECO tag |
Average +/- exp +/- (mb,theory) | 4.39 +/- 0.23 +/- 0.36 | chi2/dof = 0.81/2 (CL = 0.42) | Plots: eps pdf gif | HQE parameter input from b to c l nu and b to s gamma moments |
+-3.2stat +-3.1exp +-1.4b2c model +-2.1b2u model +-6.6HQE param +-1.1SF func +-0.7sub SF +-4.3matching +-2.4WA = +-9.8tot
where the errors correspond to the statistics, the experimental systematics, the modeling of b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu decays, the HQE parameters mb and mupi2, the functional form of the SF, the subleading shape functions, the variation of the matching scales, and the Weak Annihilation. No uncertainty is assigned for possible duality violations.