Updates of Semileptonic Results for Lepton Photon 2007

The changes of this update with respect to the status of Summer 2006 and PDG 2007 are described here.
We would like to thank I. Bigi, P. Gambino, E. Gardi, Z. Ligeti, M. Neubert, N. Uraltsev for useful discussions.
f1vcb_rho2.html

Measurement of |Vcb| F(1) in B0 -> D*lnu

The following average is based on a global four-dimensional fit of |Vcb|F(1), r2, R1 and R2 to the experiments listed. This table and the plots are based on the global fit values of R1 and R2. The values reported for each experiment have been rescaled to R1=1.423±0.064 and R2=0.762±0.061 obtained from the fit. The errors contain both the common and the experiment dependent systematic uncertainties. All available experiments have been included in the average.
Experiment |Vcb| F(1) (rescaled) [10-3] r2 (rescaled) Correlation (stat/syst/total) Parameters Remarks
ALEPH (excl) 32.7 +/- 1.8 +/- 1.3 0.63 +/- 0.25 +/- 0.12 0.94/0.60/0.72 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B395:373-,1997
CLEO 41.7 +/- 1.3 +/- 1.8
1.44 +/- 0.09 +/- 0.21
0.87/0.68/0.67
input     parameters
Phys.Rev.Lett.89:081803,2002
OPAL (excl) 37.0 +/- 1.6 +/- 1.5 1.33 +/- 0.21 +/- 0.15 0.95/0.42/0.61 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B482:15-,2000
OPAL (partial reco) 37.7+/- 1.2 +/- 2.4 1.25 +/- 0.14 +/- 0.30 0.77/0.70/0.71 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B482:15-,2000
DELPHI (partial reco) 36.0 +/- 1.4 +/- 2.3 1.28 +/- 0.14 +/- 0.27 0.94/0.77/0.79 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B510:55-,2001
BELLE (excl) 34.5 +/- 1.9 +/- 1.7 1.26 +/- 0.16 +/- 0.11 0.91/0.68/0.78 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B526:247-,2002
DELPHI (excl) 36.8 +/- 1.8 +/- 1.9 1.13 +/-0.15 +/-0.16 0.89/0.50/0.58 input     parameters Eur.Phys.J.C33:213,2004
BABAR (excl) 34.3 +/- 0.3 +/- 1.1 1.18 +/-0.05 +/-0.03 0.27 input     parameters Preliminary hep-ex/0607076 & Phys.Rev.D74:092004,2006 (supersedes Phys.Rev.D71:051502,2004)
Average 35.89 +/- 0.56 1.23 +/- 0.05 0.134
chi2/dof = 37.8/17 (CL = 0.026) eps 1  pdf 1  gif 1  eps 2  pdf 2  gif 2 

The consistency of these measurements, given the stated errors, is rather poor, chi2/dof=37.8/17=2.2, corresponding a probability of 2.6%. If we exclude the two measurements which contribute more than 10 to the chi2, we obtain chi2/dof= 11.1/10 and a probability of 35%. The corresponding averages and plots can be found here.
nada

Exclusive Branching Fraction: B0 -> D*lnu

The branching fractions measured by different experiments have been corrected for common values of R1(1) and R2(1), as obtained from the global fit to the differential decays rates. The errors include both, the common and the experiment-dependent, systematic uncertainties. All currently available measurements are listed. As stated above, the consistency of these measurements, is rather poor, resulting in a probability of 2.6%. If we exclude the two measurements which contribute more than 10 to the chi2, we obtain a probability of 35%. The corresponding averages and plots can be found here.
Experiment BF (rescaled) [%] Remarks
ALEPH (excl) 5.77 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.35 Phys.Lett.B395:373-387,1997 [Spires]
OPAL (excl) 5.15 +/- 0.20 +/- 0.37 Exclusive reco, Phys.Lett.B482:15-30,2000 [hep-ex/0003013]
CLEO 6.17 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.39 Phys.Rev.Lett.89:081803,2002
OPAL (partial reco) 5.61+/- 0.28 +/- 0.58 Partial reco, Phys.Lett.B482:15-30,2000 [hep-ex/0003013]
DELPHI (partial reco) 5.04 +/- 0.14 +/- 0.36 Partial reco, Phys.Lett.B510:55-74,2001 [hep-ex/0104026]
BELLE (excl) 4.67 +/- 0.24 +/- 0.41
Phys.Lett.B526:247-257,2002 [hep-ex/0111060]
DELPHI (excl) 5.68 +/- 0.20 +/- 0.43 Eur.Phys.J.C33:213,2004 [hep-ex/0401023]
BABAR (excl) 4.60 +/- 0.07 +/- 0.33 Phys.Rev.D71:051502,2004 [hep-ex/0408027]
Average 5.11 +/- 0.12 eps pdf gif

nada

Measurement of |Vcb|G(1) in B0 -> Dlnu

The table and plots give the results of two-dimensional fits to |Vcb|G(1)| and rho2 for different experiments, using the form factor parameterization of Caprini, Lellouch, and Neubert, Nucl.Phys. B530 (1998) 153-181 [arXiv:hep-ph/9712417v1].
Experiment |Vcb| G(1) (rescaled) [10-3] rho2 (rescaled) Correlation (stat/syst/total) Parameters Remarks
ALEPH 38.85+/- 11.80+/- 6.20 0.95+/- 0.98+/- 0.36 0.98/0.99/0.96 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B395:373-,1997
CLEO 44.77 +/- 5.90+/- 3.45 1.27+/- 0.25+/- 0.14 0.95/0.98/0.96 input     parameters Phys.Rev.Lett.82:3746-,1999
BELLE 41.11+/- 4.40 +/- 5.15 1.12+/- 0.22+/- 0.14 0.96/0.96/0.92 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B526:258-268,2002
Average 42.3+/- 4.5 1.17+/- 0.18 0.95/0.94/0.93 chi2/dof = 0.26/4 eps 1  pdf 1  gif 1  eps 2  pdf 2  gif 2 
nada

Exclusive Branching Fraction: B0 -> Dlnu

The branching fractions are obtained from the integral over the measured differential decay rates, the average BF is obtained from a one-dimensional fit of the measurements listed.
Experiment BF (rescaled) [%] Parameters Remarks
ALEPH 2.15 +/- 0.18+/- 0.37 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B395:373-387,1997 [Spires]
CLEO 2.07+/- 0.13+/- 0.16 input     parameters Phys.Rev.Lett.82:3746,1999 [hep-ex/9811042]
BELLE 2.13+/- 0.12+/- 0.39 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B526:258-268,2002 [hep-ex/0111082]
Average 2.09+/- 0.18 chi2/dof = 0.04/2 (CL = 0.99) eps pdf gif

Inclusive |V<sub>cb</sub>| from global fits

Inclusive |Vcb| from global fits

Global Fits to moments of inclusive distributions in B -> Xc l nu (lepton energy and hadron mass) and B -> Xs gamma (photon energy) transitions are performed in the framework of Heavy Quark Expansions (HQE) in two different mass schemes:

Fits to the B->Xc l nu & B->Xs g moments and separately to the B->Xc l nu moments only are performed.

Results in the Kinetic scheme:
Global Fit in the Kinetic Scheme
Moments |Vcb| (10-3) mb (GeV) mc (GeV) mupi2 (GeV2)
B->Xc l nu & B->Xs g 41.91 +/- 0.19 +/- 0.28 +/- 0.59 4.613 +/- 0.022 +/- 0.027 1.187 +/- 0.033 +/- 0.040 0.408 +/- 0.017 +/- 0.031
B->Xc l nu  41.68 +/- 0.39 +/- 0.58 4.677 +/- 0.053 1.285 +/- 0.078 0.387 +/- 0.039
References: Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 073008 [arXiv:hep-ph/0507253v3] and LP 2007 updates
Plots: (|Vcb|, mb): eps, pdf, gif (mupi2, mb): eps, pdf, gif

The errors on the results obtained using the B->Xc l nu & B->Xs g moments are experimental, theoretical and due to GammaSL (for |Vcb| only), respectively. The error on the results obtained using the B->Xc l nu moments is due to both the experimental and theoretical uncertainties. Moreover, there is also an error due to  Gamma SL for |Vcb| only.


Results in the 1S scheme:
Global Fit in the 1S Scheme
Moments |Vcb| (10-3) mb1S (GeV) lambda1 (GeV2)
B->Xc l nu & B->Xs g  41.78 +/- 0.30 +/- 0.08 4.701 +/- 0.030 -0.313 +/- 0.025
B->Xc l nu  41.56 +/- 0.39 +/- 0.08 4.751 +/- 0.058 -0.274 +/- 0.047
Reference: web page
Plots: (|Vcb|, mb): eps, pdf, gif (mupi2, mb): eps, pdf,gif

The errors include both the experimental and theoretical uncertainties  and the B lifetime uncertainty (for |Vcb| only).


Inclusive Semileptonic (Partial) Branching Fraction for B+/B0 Admixture: B -> Xlnu

This is a one-dimensional fit for the average partial branching fraction for a cut on the momentum
of the lepton at p* > 0.6 GeV/c as measured in the Upsilon(4S) frame.  Note for the Belle (Breco)
measurement, the cut was placed in the rest frame of the B-meson - the difference between the partial branching
above 0.6 GeV/c as measured in either the Upsilon(4S) and B-meson rest frames is entirely negligible.

Experiment BF (Rescaled) [%] Input Remarks
p(l) > 0.6 GeV/c
ARGUS (e tag) 9.17 +/- 0.50 +/- 0.33 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B318:397-404, 1993 [Spires]
BELLE (l tag) 10.32 +/- 0.11 +/- 0.46 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B547:181-192, 2002 [hep-ex/0208033]
CLEO (e tag) 10.24 +/- 0.08 +/- 0.22 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D70:032003,2004 [hep-ex/0403053]
BABAR (e tag) 10.37 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.23 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D69:111104, 2004 [hep-ex/0403030]
BABAR (B_{reco} tag) 10.03 +/- 0.19 +/- 0.33 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D74:091105,2006 [hep-ex/0607111]
BELLE (B_{reco} tag) 10.28 +/- 0.18 +/- 0.24 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D75:032001,2007 [hep-ex/0610012]
Average 10.24 +/- 0.15 chi2/dof = 4.2/5 (CL = 0.52) eps pdf gif
  
Using the results of the global fit (Phys.Rev.D73,073008(2006)) for HQE parameters in the Kinetic Scheme (Eur. Phys. J C 34 (2004) 181), where none of the measurements listed above have been used as input, one can extract the extrapolation factor necessary to calculate the full branching fraction,  fc = 1.0495 +/- 0.0005 +/- 0.0010. The first error is from experiment and theory in the global fit and the second error is assigned as an additional theoretical uncertainty for the ratio GammaSL(0.6)/GammaSL(0.0). For GammaSL this uncertainty is typically 1.5%, on the recommendation of the authors of the fit, for the ratio it is estimated to be 0.1%.
The full branching fraction is extracted as BF( B+/B0 -> X l nu ) = (10.75 +/- 0.16)% .

Inclusive Semileptonic Branching Fraction for B+ -> Xl+nu

  
Experiment BF(B+->) (Rescaled) [%] Input Remarks
CLEO (l tag) 10.25 +/- 0.57 +/- 0.66 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B399:321,1997 [hep-ex/9702007]
BABAR (B_{reco} tag) 10.90 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.39 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D74:091105,2006 [hep-ex/0607111]
BELLE (B_{reco} tag) 11.17 +/- 0.25 +/- 0.28 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D75:032001,2007 [hep-ex/0610012]
Average 10.99 +/- 0.28 chi2/dof = 0.97/2 (CL = 0.61) eps pdf gif
  

Inclusive Semileptonic Branching Fraction for B0 -> X-l+nu

  
Experiment BF(B0->) (Rescaled) [%] Input Remarks
CLEO (partial tag) 9.9 +/- 3.0 +/- 0.9 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D45:2212-2231,1992 [Spires]
ARGUS (partial tag) 9.3 +/- 1.1 +/- 1.5 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B324:249-254,1994 [Spires]
CLEO (partial tag) 10.78 +/- 0.60 +/- 0.69 input     parameters Phys.Lett.B399:321-328,1997 [hep-ex/9702007]
BABAR (B_{reco} tag) 10.14 +/- 0.28 +/- 0.33 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D74:091105,2006 [hep-ex/0607111]
BELLE (B_{reco} tag) 10.46 +/- 0.30 +/- 0.23 input     parameters Phys.Rev.D75:032001,2007 [hep-ex/0610012]
Average 10.33 +/- 0.28 chi2/dof = 0.95/4 (CL = 0.92) eps pdf gif
  

Ratio of Semileptonic Branching Fractions for B+ to B0 -> X-l+nu

The total width of semileptonic B meson decays is expected to be the same for both neutral and charged mesons. Therefore the ratio of the branching fractions R+0 should be equivalent to the ratio of the B-meson lifetime tauB+/tauB0 = 1.076 +/- 0.008 (PDG2007).
Experiment R_{+/0}(Rescaled) [%] Input Remarks
BABAR 1.084 +/- 0.041 +/- 0.025 input     Phys.Rev.D74:091105,2006 [hep-ex/0607111]
BELLE 1.069 +/- 0.040 +/- 0.026 input     Phys.Rev.D75:032001,2007 [hep-ex/0610012]
Average 1.076 +/- 0.034 chi2/dof = 0.05/1 (CL = 0.82) eps pdf gif
  

Inclusive Vub average for winter 2006

|Vub| from inclusive semileptonic B decays

The results in this section are determined by comparing the measured partial branching fractions in selected regions of phase-space to theoretical calculations of the corresponding rates, which are proportional to |Vub|2. We extract |Vub| using three theoretical frameworks:

We perform the following |Vub| averages for:

No attempt is made to average values for |Vub| based on BLNP, DGE or BLL derived |V_ub|, but the results are presented independently per each scheme.

The procedure for performing the average is documented in arXiv:0704.3575.

The input files for the average are linked in the tables with the averages. To summarize briefly, all theoretical uncertainties are considered to be correlated, as are the uncertainties on the modeling of b -> clnu and b -> ulnu decays. Experimental uncertainties (particle identification, reconstruction efficiencies, etc.) are taken as correlated amongst measurements from the same experiment, but not correlated across experiments.

The errors in the tables are experimental (statistical and systematic) and external (theoretical and HQ parameter uncertainties). The average B lifetime used is 1.585 ps.

Determination of Vub (BLNP)

Determination of |Vub| (BLNP)

The |Vub| values are obtained using the HQE input parameters mb(SF) and mupi2. Their central values, derived in the kinetic scheme, are taken from Phys.Rev.D73,073008(2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0507253v3], where they are translated to the Shape Function scheme used by BLNP. The uncertainties are increased to 0.06 GeV and 0.06 GeV2, respectively, according to M. Neubert's private communication, to take into account the uncertainty due to higher order corrections not accounted for in the partial rate predictions for B->Xulnu. The values of the HQE parameters used for the determination of |Vub| are then:

The exponential form of the Shape Function is taken as default and variations with respect to this form are taken as error. BLNP : Vub with HQ parameters from b -> c l nu and b -> s g moments
|Vub | (BLNP)
Experiment Value [10-3] Parameters References Remarks
CLEO (E_{e}) 3.91 +/- 0.46 +/- 0.44 input Phys.Rev.Lett.88:231803,2002 [arXiv:hep-ex/0202019v1] 2.1 < p < 2.6
BELLE sim. ann. (m_{X}, q^{2}) 4.23 +/- 0.45 +/- 0.36 input Phys.Rev.Lett.92:101801,2004 [arXiv:hep-ex/0311048v2] mX - Q2, tag with annealing method
BELLE (E_{e}) 4.67 +/- 0.43 +/- 0.38 input Phys.Lett.B621:28-40 (2005) (arXiv:hep-ex/0504046v2 1.9 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}) 4.23 +/- 0.24 +/- 0.39 input Phys.Rev.D73:012006,2006 arXiv:hep-ex/0509040v2 2.0 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}, s^{max}_{h}) 4.37 +/- 0.29 +/- 0.49 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:111801,2005 , Erratum-ibid.97:019903,2006 [arXiv:hep-ex/0506036v3] (Ee-q2)
BELLE (m_{X}) 3.92 +/- 0.26 +/- 0.32 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 [arXiv:hep-ex/0505088v2] mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used). Cut on the hadronic mass at 1.7 GeV
BABAR (m_{X}) 4.09 +/- 0.20 +/- 0.39 input [arXiv:0708.3702v1] mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used). Cut on the hadronic mass at 1.55 GeV
Average +/- exp +/- (mb,theory) 4.31 +/- 0.17 +/- 0.35 chi2/dof = 6.1/6 (CL = 0.42) Plots: eps pdf gif HQE parameter input from b to c l nu and b to s gamma moments
The full breakdown of the uncertainties on the average |Vub| above is (all errors quoted in percent):

+-2.0stat +-2.6exp +-1.8b2c model +-1.1b2u model +-6.9HQE param +-1.0SF func +-0.9sub SF +-3.6matching +-1.7WA = +-8.9tot

where the fractions correspond to the statistical error (stat), the experimental systematics (exp), the modeling, e.g. branching fractions for exclusive decays, of b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu decays (b2c model and b2u model, respectively), the HQE parameters mb and mupi2 (HQE param), the functional form of the SF (ie the variation from the exponential to the Gaussian form of the SF, SF func), the subleading shape functions (sub SF), the variation of the matching scales (matching), and the Weak Annihilation (WA). No uncertainty is assigned for possible duality violations. The quoted experimental error in the table above corresponds to the statistical, experimental systematic and the b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu modeling errors. The other uncertainties contribute to the theoretical error.

Averages of the endpoint, mxq2, mx, Pplus analyses are also presented in the corresponding links.

BLNP : Vub with HQ parameters from b -> c l nu moments

Determination of |Vub| (BLNP) using only b -> c l nu moments (January 7 2008 update)

translated in the SF scheme (M.Neubert) from the kinetic scheme fit using the b->clnu moments . The total error is due to the contribution of the error due to the ellipse (4.707 +0.054/-0.052 GeV) and the one due to scale variation for alphas (4.707 +0.0240/-0.0113 GeV). Similarly, for mupi2 (ellipse error: 0.216 +0.041/-0.043 GeV^2, 'scale' error: 0.216 +0.035/-0.062 GeV^2).
|Vub | (BLNP)
Experiment Value [10-3] Parameters References Remarks
CLEO (E_{e}) 3.52 +/- 0.41 +/- 0.35 input Phys.Rev.Lett.88:231803,2002 [arXiv:hep-ex/0202019v1] 2.1 < p < 2.6
BELLE sim. ann. (m_{X}, q^{2}) 3.97 +/- 0.42 +/- 0.31 input Phys.Rev.Lett.92:101801,2004 [arXiv:hep-ex/0311048v2] mX - Q2, tag with annealing method
BELLE (E_{e}) 4.35 +/- 0.40 +/- 0.33 input Phys.Lett.B621:28-40 (2005) (arXiv:hep-ex/0504046v2 1.9 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}) 3.89 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.33 input Phys.Rev.D73:012006,2006 arXiv:hep-ex/0509040v2 2.0 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}, s^{max}_{h}) 3.94 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.39 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:111801,2005 , Erratum-ibid.97:019903,2006 [arXiv:hep-ex/0506036v3] (Ee-q2)
BELLE (m_{X}) 3.66 +/- 0.24 +/- 0.27 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 [arXiv:hep-ex/0505088v2] mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used). Cut on the hadronic mass at 1.7 GeV
BABAR (m_{X}) 3.74 +/- 0.18 +/- 0.31 input [arXiv:0708.3702v1] mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used). Cut on the hadronic mass at 1.55 GeV
Average +/- exp +/- (mb,theory) 3.98 +/- 0.15 +/- 0.30 chi2/dof = 6.3/6 (CL = 0.39) Plots: eps pdf gif HQE parameter input from b to c l nu moments
The full breakdown of the uncertainties on the average |Vub| above is (all errors quoted in percent):

+-2.0stat +-2.5exp +-1.8b2c model +-1.1b2u model +-6.3HQE param +-0.4SF func +-0.7sub SF +-3.6matching +-1.4WA = +-8.3tot

where the fractions correspond to the statistical error (stat), the experimental systematics (exp), the modeling, e.g. branching fractions for exclusive decays, of b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu decays (b2c model and b2u model, respectively), the HQE parameters mb and mupi2 (HQE param), the functional form of the SF (ie the variation from the exponential to the Gaussian form of the SF, SF func), the subleading shape functions (sub SF), the variation of the matching scales (matching), and the Weak Annihilation (WA). No uncertainty is assigned for possible duality violations. The quoted experimental error in the table above corresponds to the statistical, experimental systematic and the b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu modeling errors. The other uncertainties contribute to the theoretical error.

Using only the m_{X} analyses, the average is: 3.70+/-0.15+/-0.28 10-3. Determination of Vub (DGE)

Determination of |Vub| (DGE)

The |Vub| values are obtained using the HQE input parameter (from PDG07):

|Vub| (DGE)
Experiment Value [10-3] Parameters References Remarks
CLEO (E_{e}) 3.84 +/- 0.45 +/- 0.30 input Phys.Rev.Lett.88:231803,2002 (hep-ex/0202019) 2.1 < p < 2.6
BELLE sim. ann. (m_{X}, q^{2}) 4.42 +/- 0.47 +/- 0.26 input Phys.Rev.Lett.92:101801,2004 (hep-ex/0311048) mX - Q2, tag with annealing method
BELLE (E_{e}) 4.79 +/- 0.45 +/- 0.26 input Phys.Lett.B621:28-40 (2005) (hep-ex/0504046) 1.9 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}) 4.29 +/- 0.29 +/- 0.28 input Phys.Rev.D73:012006,2006 (hep-ex/0509040) 2.0 < p < 2.6
BABAR (E_{e}, s^{max}_{h}) 4.42 +/- 0.30 +/- 0.38 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 (hep-ex/0506036 (version 3, June 2006)) (Ee-q2)
BELLE m_{X} 4.29 +/- 0.28 +/- 0.28 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 (hep-ex/0505088) mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used)
BABAR m_{X} 4.56 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.32 input [arXiv:0708.3702v1] mX, BRECO tag; other methods (mX-q2 and P+ not used)
Average +/- exp +/- (mb,theory) 4.34 +/- 0.16 +/- 0.25 chi2/dof = 2.3/6 (CL = 0.89) Plots: eps pdf gif mb input from PDG07 average
The full breakdown of the uncertainties on the average |Vub| above is (all errors quoted in percent):

+-2.0stat +-2.4exp +-1.9b2c model +-1.0b2u model +-0.6alpha_s R_CUT +-3.2mb R_CUT +-3.0TOTAL SL WIDTH +-1.9WA +-3.1DGE theory

=+-6.8tot

where the fractions correspond to the statistical error (stat), the experimental systematics (exp), the modeling, e.g. branching fractions for exclusive decays, of the b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu decays (b2c model and b2u model, respectively), the effect of the alphas uncertainty on R_CUT (alpha_s R_CUT), the effect of the uncertainty on mb on the prediction of the event fraction (mb R_CUT), the uncertainty on the total semileptonic B width (TOTAL SL WIDTH), the Weak Annihilation (WA) and from the change and variation of scale of the matching scheme (DGE theory). The quoted experimental error in the table above corresponds to the statistical, experimental systematic and the b -> c l and b -> u l nu modeling errors. The other uncertainties contribute to the theoretical error.

Averages of the endpoint, mxq2, mx, Pplus analyses are also presented in the corresponding links.

Determination of Vub (BLL)

Determination of |Vub| (BLL) using the (mx-q2) analyses

The |Vub| values are obtained using the b-quark mass from the 1S Global Fit

|Vub| (BLL) using the (mx-q2) analyses
Experiment Value [10-3] Parameters References Remarks
BELLE breco (m_{X}, q^{2}) 5.01 +/- 0.39 +/- 0.37 input Phys.Rev.Lett.95:241801,2005 (hep-ex/0505088) mX-q2, BRECO tag
BELLE sim. ann. (m_{X}, q^{2}) 4.70 +/- 0.49 +/- 0.35 input Phys.Rev.Lett.92:101801,2004 (hep-ex/0311048) mX - Q2, tag with annealing method
BABAR (m_{X}, q^{2}) 4.81 +/- 0.32 +/- 0.35 input [arXiv:0708.3702v1] mX-q2, BRECO tag
Average +/- exp +/- (mb,theory) 4.83 +/- 0.24 +/- 0.37 chi2/dof = 0.48/2 (CL = 0.79) Plots: eps pdf gif HQE parameter input from b to c l nu and b to s gamma moments
The full breakdown of the uncertainties on the average |Vub| above is (all errors quoted in percent):

+-3.2stat +-3.8exp +-1.3b2c model +-2.1b2u model +-3.0Strf +-3.0Pert +-4.5Sf +-4.0H.O. = +-9.0tot

where the fractions correspond to the statistical error (stat), the experimental systematics (exp), the modeling, e.g. branching fractions for exclusive decays, of b -> c l nu and b -> u l nu decays (b2c model and b2u model, respectively), the residual shape function effects (Strf), the higher order terms in the alphas expansion (Pert), the uncertainty on the b-quark mass (Sf), and the third order terms in the OPE expansion(H.O.). No uncertainty is assigned for possible duality violations. Vub comparison_with LLR method

Shape Function Model Independent extraction of |Vub| from inclusive decays and comparison of results

Several years ago, M. Neubert (Phys. Rev. D49, 4623 (1994) ) suggested that |Vub| could be extracted by combining weighted integrals over the photon spectrum in B->Xs gamma decays with integrals over the lepton momentum spectrum near the kinematic endpoint in inclusive B->Xulnu decays decays. The underlying assumption is that the QCD interactions affecting these two processes are the same to leading order, and therefore ratios of decay rates for the two processes have significantly lower sensitivity to the choice of the shape-functions parameterization.
So far, there are two BABAR measurements based on this suggestion to extract |Vub| from charmless B-meson decays from inclusive distributions for different regions of phase space.
BABAR measured |Vub| in inclusive decays using the prescription of Leibovich, Low, and Rothstein (LLR), Phys.Rev.D62:014010,2000 [arXiv:hep-ph/0001028v2], and Phys.Lett.B486:86-91,2000 [arXiv:hep-ph/0005124v1], that extracts |Vub| with reduced model dependence by combining data of the hadronic mass spectrum from B->Xulnu decays with that of the photon energy spectrum from B->Xs gamma decays (Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 052004 [arXiv:hep-ex/0508004v2]).
Using BABAR measurements of the lepton momentum spectrum near the kinematic endpoint, Phys.Rev. D73 (2006) 012006 [arXiv:hep-ex/0509040v2], three different theoretical prescriptions were tried to extract |Vub|, arXiv:hep-ph/0702072v1, namely LLR (Phys.Rev. D61 (2000) 053006 [arXiv:hep-ph/9909404v2]]), Neubert (Phys.Lett. B513 (2001) 88-92 [arXiv:hep-ph/0104280v3]) and more recent calculations by Lange, Neubert and Paz (JHEP 0510 (2005) 084 [arXiv:hep-ph/0508178v2] and JHEP 0601 (2006) 104 [arXiv:hep-ph/0511098v1]). In the following, we provide a comparison of the results of the different |Vub| extractions.

The errors on |Vub| are experimental and theoretical, respectively, for the first three results and experimental on B->Xulnu, experimental on B->Xsgamma, theoretical and due to |Vts| for the last three measurments.

Vub comparison_with LLR method
Description Vub [10-3] Reference
HFAG Ave. (BLNP) 4.31 +/- 0.17 +/- 0.35
HFAG Ave. (DGE) 4.34 +/- 0.16 +/- 0.25
HFAG Ave. (BLL) 4.83 +/- 0.24 +/- 0.37
BABAR (LLR) 4.43 +/- 0.45 +/- 0.29 Phys.Rev.Lett. 96 (2006) 221801 [arXiv:hep-ex/0601046v2]
BABAR endpoint (LLR) 4.28 +/- 0.29 +/- 0.29 +/- 0.26 +/- 0.28 arXiv:hep-ph/0702072v1
BABAR endpoint (Neubert) 4.01 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.29 +/- 0.32 +/- 0.27 arXiv:hep-ph/0702072v1
BABAR endpoint (LNP) 4.40 +/- 0.30 +/- 0.41 +/- 0.23 arXiv:hep-ph/0702072v1

A plot of this table is available in three formats: eps pdf gif


B -> pi l nu average

Branching fractions of B -> pi l nu

The measurements quoted here include both B0 and B+ decays; the average assumes equality of the semileptonic decays widths for these isospin-conjugate states, and is quoted for B0 decays.

Experiment / Mode BF [10-4] BF(q2<16 GeV2) [10-4] BF(q2>16 GeV2) [10-4] Reference
BABAR SL tag: B ^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{0} l^{+} \nu \times 2\tau_{0}/\tau_{+} 1.36 +/- 0.33 +/- 0.15 1.17 +/- 0.30 +/- 0.11 0.19 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.07 SL tag, Phys.Rev.Lett.97:211801,2006 [hep-ex/0607089] (input)
BABAR B_{reco} tag: B ^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{0} l^{+} \nu \times 2\tau_{0}/\tau_{+} 1.52 +/- 0.41 +/- 0.20 1.04 +/- 0.35 +/- 0.15 0.48 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.11 Breco tag, Phys.Rev.Lett.97:211801,2006 [hep-ex/0607089] (input)
BELLE SL tag: B ^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{0} l^{+} \nu \times 2\tau_{0}/\tau_{+} 1.43 +/- 0.26 +/- 0.16 1.06 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.11 0.37 +/- 0.15 +/- 0.04 SL tag, Phys.Lett.B648:139-148,2007 [hep-ex/0604024] (input)
BELLE B_{reco} tag: B ^{+} \rightarrow \pi^{0} l^{+} \nu \times 2\tau_{0}/\tau_{+} 1.60 +/- 0.32 +/- 0.11 NA NA Preliminary, Breco tag hep-ex/0610054 (input)
BABAR SL tag: B ^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{-} l^{+} \nu 1.12 +/- 0.25 +/- 0.10 0.83 +/- 0.22 +/- 0.08 0.29 +/- 0.15 +/- 0.04 SL tag, Phys.Rev.Lett.97:211801,2006 [hep-ex/0607089] (input)
BELLE SL tag: B ^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{-} l^{+} \nu 1.38 +/- 0.19 +/- 0.14 1.02 +/- 0.16 +/- 0.11 0.36 +/- 0.10 +/- 0.04 SL tag, Phys.Lett.B648:139-148,2007 [hep-ex/0604024] (input)
BABAR B_{reco} tag: B ^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{-} l^{+} \nu 1.07 +/- 0.27 +/- 0.15 0.42 +/- 0.18 +/- 0.05 0.65 +/- 0.20 +/- 0.13 Breco tag, Phys.Rev.Lett.97:211801,2006 [hep-ex/0607089] (input)
CLEO untagged: B \rightarrow \pi l^{+} \nu 1.33 +/- 0.18 +/- 0.11 1.08 +/- 0.16 +/- 0.10 0.25 +/- 0.09 +/- 0.05 Untagged, Phys. Rev. D 68, 072003 (2003) [hep-ex/0304019] (input)
BABAR untagged: B \rightarrow \pi l^{+} \nu 1.46 +/- 0.07 +/- 0.08 1.09 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.07 0.38 +/- 0.04 +/- 0.03 Untagged loose neutrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 091801 (2007) [hep-ex/0612020 ] (input)
BELLE B_{reco} tag: B ^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{-} l^{+} \nu 1.49 +/- 0.26 +/- 0.06 NA NA Preliminary, Breco tag hep-ex/0610054 (input)
Average: B ^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{-} l^{+} \nu 1.39 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.06 0.97 +/- 0.05 +/- 0.05 0.35 +/- 0.03 +/- 0.03 Plots: eps pdf gif   chi2/dof = 3.23/9 (CL = 0.95)

Vub from B -> pi l nu average

Exclusive |Vub| determination

The partial BF quoted above along with theoretical calculations of the form factor normalization can be used to determine |Vub|; a few recent calculations are shown below. Note that the FNAL04 and HPQCD unquenched LQCD calculations are not entirely independent, and we do not use their quenched results as they are superseded by their unquenched results. We also use the quenched LQCD result of the APE collaboration. The Ball-Zwicky calculation is based on light-cone sum rules.  At this time we do not attempt to average the |Vub| results or select a best value. We divide the results into two tables: the first table lists extractions of |Vub| in q2 regions where the theory formulation is applicable and the second lists results where these same formulations have relied on a model to extrapolate to the uncovered q2 region.

The errors on |Vub| are experimental and theoretical, respectively.

FF calculation Vub [10-3] q2 range FF norm (ps-1) Reference
Ball-Zwicky q^2 < 16 3.41 +/- 0.13 +0.56-0.38 <16 GeV2 5.44 +/- 1.43 Phys. Rev. D71:014015 (2005) [hep-ph/0406232]
HPQCD q^2 > 16 3.33 +/- 0.21 +0.58-0.38 >16 GeV2 2.07 +/- 0.57 Phys.Rev.D73, 074502 (2006), Erratum-ibid.D75:119906,2007 [hep-lat/0601021]
FNAL q^2 > 16 3.55 +/- 0.22 +0.61-0.40 >16 GeV2 1.83 +/- 0.50 Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl.140:461-463,2005 [hep-lat/0409116]
APE q^2 > 16 3.58 +/- 0.22 +1.37-0.63 >16 GeV2 1.80 +/- 0.86 Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2000) 565-587 [hep-lat/0011065]

A plot of this table is available in three formats: eps pdf gif

FF calculation Vub [10-3] q2 range FF norm (ps-1) Reference
Ball-Zwicky full q^2 3.43 +/- 0.10 +0.67-0.42 full 7.74 +/- 2.32 Phys. Rev. D71:014015 (2005) [hep-ph/0406232]
HPQCD full q^2 3.17 +/- 0.10 +0.74-0.44 full 9.10 +/- 3.13 Phys.Rev.D73, 074502 (2006), Erratum-ibid.D75:119906,2007 [hep-lat/0601021]
FNAL full q^2 3.82 +/- 0.12 +0.88-0.52 full 6.24 +/- 2.12 Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl.140:461-463,2005 [hep-lat/0409116]
APE full q^2 3.61 +/- 0.11 +1.11-0.57 full 7.0 +/- 2.9 Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2000) 565-587 [hep-lat/0011065]

A plot of this table is available in three formats: eps pdf gif

Branching fractions of B->rholnu

Branching fractions of B -> rho l nu

The measurements quoted here include both B0 and B+ decays; the average assumes equality of the semileptonic decays widths for these isospin-conjugate states, and is quoted for B0 decays.

Experiment/Mode BF [10-4] Reference
CLEO: B^{0} \rightarrow \rho^{-} l^{+} \nu 2.69 +/-0.41 +/- 0.65 Phys. Rev. D 61, 052001 (2000) [hep-ex/9905056] (input)
CLEO: B^{0} \rightarrow \rho^{-} l^{+} \nu 2.17 +/-0.34 +/- 0.63 Phys. Rev. D 68, 072003 (2003)[hep-ex/0304019] (input)
BABAR: B^{0} \rightarrow \rho^{-} l^{+} \nu 2.14 +/-0.21 +/-0.56 Untagged, Phys .Rev. D72, 051102 (2005) [hep-ex/0507003] (input)
BELLE: B^{0} \rightarrow \rho^{-} l^{+} \nu 2.17 +/-0.54 +/-0.32 SL tag, Phys.Lett.B648:139-148,2007 [hep-ex/0604024] (input)
BELLE: B^{+} \rightarrow \rho^{0} l^{+} \nu\times 2\tau_{0}/\tau_{+} 2.47 +/-0.43 +/-0.33 SL tag, Phys.Lett.B648:139-148,2007 [hep-ex/0604024] (input)
Average: B ^{0} \rightarrow \rho^{-} l^{+} \nu 2.38 +/- 0.20 +/- 0.32 Plots: eps pdf gif   chi2/dof = 0.96/4 (CL = 0.92)
nada

Branching fractions of other exclusive charmless semileptonic decays

Experiment Mode BF [10-4] Reference
CLEO B+-> eta l+ nu 0.84 +/-0.31 +0.16 +/-0.09 Phys. Rev. D 68, 072003 (2003) [hep-ex/0304019]
BABAR B+-> eta l+ nu 0.84 +/-0.27 +/- 0.21 Preliminary Breco [hep-ex/0607066]
BABAR B+-> eta' l+ nu 0.33 +/-0.60 +/- 0.30 Preliminary Breco [hep-ex/0607066]
BELLE B+-> omega l+ nu 1.3 +/-0.4 +/-0.2 +/-0.3 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:131803 (2004)[hep-ex/0402023]


Last update: 2008/01/07 Francesca Di Lodovico (Bug fix).