HFAG: CPV & Unitarity Triangle Parameters
Home
Results
Documentation
Organization
Oscillations
Semileptonic
Rare Decays
Unitarity Triangle
B to Charm
Charm Physics
Tau Physics


Time-dependent CP Asymmetries in Bd→ π+ππ0 (Bd→ ρ+−0π−+0)

Both BaBar and Belle have performed a full time-dependent Dalitz plot analyses of the decay Bd → (ρπ)0 → π+ππ0, which allows to simultaneously determine the complex decay amplitudes and the CP-violating weak phase α ≡ φ2. The analysis follows the idea of Snyder and Quinn (1993), implemented as suggested by Quinn and Silva. The experiments determine 27 coefficients of the form factor bilinears from the fit to data. Physics parameters, such as the quasi-two-body parameters, and the phases δ+−=arg[A−+A+−*] and the UT angle α ≡ φ2, are determined from subsequent fits to the bilinear coefficients.

Please note that at present we do not apply a rescaling of the results to a common, updated set of input parameters. Correlation due to common systematics are neglected in the following averages.

Measurement BaBar
N(BB)=471M
Belle
N(BB)=449M
Average
U+0 0.23 ± 0.03 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.05 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.03
U+ 1.22 ± 0.07 ± 0.05 1.27 ± 0.13 ± 0.09 1.21 ± 0.07
U0 0.04 ± 0.05 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.11 ± 0.08 0.05 ± 0.05
U −0.27 ± 0.10 ± 0.06 −0.62 ± 0.16 ± 0.08 −0.37 ± 0.10
U+ 0.25 ± 0.09 ± 0.07 0.23 ± 0.15 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.09
I0 −0.04 ± 0.04 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.10 ± 0.05 −0.03 ± 0.04
I- −0.00 ± 0.06 ± 0.03 0.09 ± 0.10 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.06
I+ 0.05 ± 0.06 ± 0.03 −0.01 ± 0.11 ± 0.04 0.03 ± 0.06
U+,Im+− −0.07 ± 0.26 ± 0.26 1.18 ± 0.86 ± 0.34 0.15 ± 0.33
U+,Re+− −0.19 ± 0.25 ± 0.33 0.49 ± 0.86 ± 0.52 0.06 ± 0.37
U−,Im+− 1.10 ± 0.50 ± 0.80 −2.32 ± 1.74 ± 0.91 0.67 ± 0.82
U−,Re+− −0.50 ± 0.50 ± 0.80 −1.18 ± 1.61 ± 0.72 −0.45 ± 0.81
IIm+− −0.50 ± 0.70 ± 0.90 −1.93 ± 2.39 ± 0.89 −0.65 ± 1.01
IRe+− −0.60 ± 0.80 ± 1.00 1.21 ± 2.59 ± 0.98 −0.40 ± 1.10
U+,Im+0 0.41 ± 0.16 ± 0.17 −0.57 ± 0.35 ± 0.51 0.27 ± 0.22
U+,Re+0 0.01 ± 0.15 ± 0.19 0.29 ± 0.50 ± 0.35 0.05 ± 0.22
U−,Im+0 0.10 ± 0.29 ± 0.45 −0.41 ± 1.00 ± 0.47 −0.08 ± 0.47
U−,Re+0 0.30 ± 0.32 ± 0.38 −2.37 ± 1.36 ± 0.60 −0.05 ± 0.47
IIm+0 −0.04 ± 0.36 ± 0.43 −0.40 ± 1.86 ± 0.85 0.01 ± 0.53
IRe+0 0.50 ± 0.50 ± 0.70 1.15 ± 2.26 ± 0.92 0.46 ± 0.78
U+,Im−0 −0.39 ± 0.20 ± 0.24 −1.34 ± 0.60 ± 0.47 −0.58 ± 0.28
U+,Re−0 −0.05 ± 0.17 ± 0.18 0.25 ± 0.60 ± 0.33 0.05 ± 0.22
U−,Im−0 0.53 ± 0.44 ± 0.52 −0.02 ± 1.31 ± 0.83 0.67 ± 0.61
U−,Re−0 0.49 ± 0.35 ± 0.37 −0.53 ± 1.44 ± 0.65 0.35 ± 0.47
IIm−0 −0.61 ± 0.43 ± 0.46 −2.03 ± 1.62 ± 0.81 −0.62 ± 0.58
IRe−0 0.40 ± 0.60 ± 0.80 −0.92 ± 1.34 ± 0.80 −0.36 ± 0.81
Correlations (stat) (syst) (stat) (stat)
Reference PRD 88 (2013) 012003 PRL 98 (2007) 221602 HFAG correlated average
χ2 = 17/26 dof (CL=0.90 ⇒ 0.1σ)
Compilation of averages of the form factor bilinears.
The data in these plots is taken from (BaBar) PRD 88 (2013) 012003 and (Belle) PRL 98 (2007) 221602.

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

From the bilinear coefficients given above, both experiments extract "quasi-two-body" (Q2B) parameters. Considering only the charged ρ bands in the Dalitz plot, the Q2B analysis involves 5 different parameters, one of which − the charge asymmetry ACP(ρπ) − is time-independent. The time-dependent decay rate is given by

Γ( B → ρ+−π−+ (Δt) ) = (1 +− ACP(ρπ)) e−|Δt|/τ/8τ × [1 + Qtag(Sρπ+−ΔSρπ)sin(ΔmΔt) − Qtag(Cρπ+−ΔCρπ)cos(ΔmΔt)],

where Qtag=+1(−1) when the tagging meson is a B0 (B0-bar). CP symmetry is violated if either one of the following conditions is true: ACP(ρπ)≠0, Cρπ≠0 or Sρπ≠0. The first two correspond to CP violation in the decay, while the last condition is CP violation in the interference of decay amplitudes with and without Bd mixing.

We average the quasi-two-body parameters provided by the experiments, which should be equivalent to determining average values directly from the averaged bilinear coefficients.

It can be convenient to transform the experimentally motivated CP parameters ACP(ρπ) and Cρπ into the physically motivated choices
A+−(ρπ) = (|κ+−|2−1)/(|κ+−|2+1) = −(ACP(ρπ)+Cρπ+ACP(ρπ)ΔCρπ)/(1+ΔCρπ + ACP(ρπ)Cρπ),
A−+(ρπ) = (|κ−+|2−1)/(|κ−+|2+1) = (−ACP(ρπ)+Cρπ+ACP(ρπ)ΔCρπ)/(−1+ΔCρπ + ACP(ρπ)Cρπ),
where κ+− = (q/p)Abar−+/A+− and κ−+ = (q/p)Abar+−/A−+. With this definition A−+(ρπ) (A+−(ρπ)) describes CP violation in Bd decays where the ρ is emitted (not emitted) by the spectator interaction. Both experiments obtain values for A+− and A−+, which we average. Again, this procedure should be equivalent to extracting these values directly from the previous results.

In addition to the Bd→ ρ+−π−+ quasi-two-body contributions to the π+ππ0 final state, there can also be a Bd→ ρ0π0 component. Both experiments have also extracted the quasi-two-body parameters associated with this intermediate state.

Note again that at present we do not apply a rescaling of the results to a common, updated set of input parameters. Correlations due to possible common systematics are neglected in the following averages.

The citation given for Belle in the tables below corresponds to a short article published in PRL. A more detailed article on the same analysis is also available as PRD 77 (2008) 072001.

Experiment ACP+−π−+) C (ρ+−π−+) S (ρ+−π−+) ΔC (ρ+−π−+) ΔS (ρ+−π−+) Correlations Reference
BaBar
N(BB)=471M
−0.10 ± 0.03 ± 0.02 0.02 ± 0.06 ± 0.04 0.05 ± 0.08 ± 0.03 0.23 ± 0.06 ± 0.05 0.05 ± 0.08 ± 0.04 (stat) PRD 88 (2013) 012003
Belle
N(BB)=449M
−0.12 ± 0.05 ± 0.04 −0.13 ± 0.09 ± 0.05 0.06 ± 0.13 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.10 ± 0.05 −0.08 ± 0.13 ± 0.05 (stat) PRL 98 (2007) 221602
Average −0.11 ± 0.03 −0.03 ± 0.06 0.06 ± 0.07 0.27 ± 0.06 0.01 ± 0.08 (stat) HFAG correlated average
χ2 = 3.5/5 dof (CL=0.63 ⇒ 0.5σ)
Figures:

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

eps.gz png
.
Experiment A−++−π−+) A+−+−π−+) Correlation Reference
BaBar
N(BB)=471M
−0.12 ± 0.08 +0.04 −0.05 0.09 +0.05 −0.06 ± 0.04 0.55 PRD 88 (2013) 012003
Belle
N(BB)=449M
0.08 ± 0.16 ± 0.11 0.21 ± 0.08 ± 0.04 0.47 PRL 98 (2007) 221602
Average −0.08 ± 0.08 0.13 ± 0.05 0.37 HFAG correlated average
χ2 = 1.5/2 dof (CL=0.47 ⇒ 0.7σ)
Figures:

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

eps.gz png
Experiment C (ρ0π0) S (ρ0π0) Correlation Reference
BaBar
N(BB)=471M
0.19 ± 0.23 ± 0.15 −0.37 ± 0.34 ± 0.20 0.00 PRD 88 (2013) 012003
Belle
N(BB)=449M
0.49 ± 0.36 ± 0.28 0.17 ± 0.57 ± 0.35 0.08 PRL 98 (2007) 221602
Average 0.27 ± 0.24 −0.23 ± 0.34 0.02 HFAG correlated average
χ2 = 0.8/2 dof (CL=0.68 ⇒ 0.4σ)
Figures:

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

eps.gz png

Interpretations:
The information given above can be used to extract α ≡ φ2.
A confidence level interpretation for α can be obtained by scanning over the measured form factor bilinears. In addition, information from the B → ρπ SU(2) partners can be included via an isospin pentagon relation. The isospin analysis uses as input the branching fractions and CP-violating charge asymmetries of all five ρπ decay modes (ρ+ππ+, ρ0π0, ρ+π0, ρ0π+). With all information in the ρπ channels put together, Belle obtain the constraint 68° < φ2 < 95° at 68% confidence level, for the solution consistent with the Standard Model. BaBar present a scan, but not an interval, for α, since their studies indicate that the obtained value is not robust.

NB. It is implied in the above constraints on α ≡ φ2 that a mirror solution at α → α + π ≡ φ2 → φ2 + π also exists.

For more details on the world average for α ≡ φ2, calculated with different statistical treatments, refer to the CKMfitter and UTfit pages.




Valid HTML 4.01!