re combined comments from the rest of the LCLS Controls group: - It needs to be a requirement that all HVAC values (air pressures, humidities, temperatures) are available to read in EPICS within 500 ms of having changed, so that they can be timestamped. - Note that it would be possible to do the HVAC system with EPICS. The LCLS Controls Group is available and willing to work with the vendor to provide training and guidance in this area. - PLCs need to be standardized to be Allen-Bradley Control Logix PLCs. We have EPICS drivers for this PLC already, so the job to get the data into EPICS databases and displayed on screens is straightforward. - Where there is equipment that runs in its own standalone box, it may be necessary for EPICS device drivers to be written to be able to get the data out. LCLS Controls Group could write these drivers. - It's a concern that the cable trays with sensitive instrument cables may get interference from the stepper motor cables. Since the high voltage is already in a separate tray, do we still need one more cable tray (for a total of 3), so that BPM cables are not in same tray as stepper motors? This is the what they did at SNS. Mario is not worried about this and comments: "Stepper motor cables do not run with BPM's in Injection. A very few BPM's may have short lengths of parallel runs in the tunnel trays, but that's it. Linac steppers that originate in the same racks as Inj pass the BPM racks (RF Hut)through to the downstream penetration. There is next to no interaction between the cable sets." Here is some follow-up discussion on this point with Dak and Mario: Stepper motor cables do not run with BPM's in Injection. A very few BPM's may have short lengths of parallel runs in the tunnel trays, but that's it. Linac steppers that originate in the same racks as Inj pass the BPM racks (RF Hut)through to the downstream penetration. There is next to no interaction between the cable sets. Mario Ortega x3612 Do we know the voltage and current rating of the those Stepper motor cables? And how many there are?.I ask this so we can determine if it is really a problem and minimize the interference to the sensitive cables. Dak Baltazar The hard part is that we don't know yet which steppers we will be using... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments on "Conventional Facilites Specs for the Sector 20 Alcove" by Dave Dowell on Aug.2/2004: - page 2 needs the section for the RF Hut put back in - tables II-V need, at a minimum, 4 network connections (for the current plan allowing 4 indendent Gigabit LANs in the injector) at each location (Laser Bay, Laser Bay Controlled Entry Area, Storage & Local Control, Load Lock and RF Hut). - One final concern is that, owing to the very tight tolerances on RF jitter and timing resolutions (to run at 120 Hz), some shielding may be needed to reduce the electrical noise in the different locations: Laser Bay, Laser Bay Controlled Entry Area, Storage & Local Control, Load Lock and RF Hut. It would probably be easier & cheaper to do this during the initial construction. Here is Ron Akre's view of this final concern: "We have discussed this in the past. To properly shield the room, all of the cables going into and out of the room would require proper shielding and filtering. If this is not done properly, the cables form a network of antennas which bring noise into the room and defeat the shielding. To properly shield the RF Hut and Laser room would likely cost about 0.5M$. There is also going to be crates in the RF HUT and Laser room which I believe will generate RFI. The decision was made to shield the sensitive devices where they need it. If we have a better idea of what equipment is going into each room we may want to revisit this decision."