Received: from lists1.slac.stanford.edu (134.79.16.26) by
 exch-hub1.win.slac.stanford.edu (134.79.164.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (TLS) id 8.1.436.0; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:04:02 -0700
Received: from lists1.slac.stanford.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by
 lists1.slac.stanford.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o91K40H9003503	for
 <image-slac-outgoing@lists1.slac.stanford.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:04:00
 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from owner-image-slac@slac.stanford.edu)
Received: (from pmx4@localhost)	by lists1.slac.stanford.edu
 (8.14.4/8.12.11/Submit) id o91K40Fv003502	for image-slac-outgoing; Fri, 1 Oct
 2010 13:04:00 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from owner-image-slac@slac.stanford.edu)
Received: from nospam5.slac.stanford.edu (nospam5.slac.stanford.edu
 [134.79.18.83])	by lists1.slac.stanford.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
 o91K3wHL003498	for <image-slac@lists1.slac.stanford.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010
 13:03:59 -0700 (PDT)	(envelope-from stephenalewis@mac.com)
Received: from asmtpout015.mac.com (asmtpout015.mac.com [17.148.16.90])	by
 nospam5.slac.stanford.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o91K3wmS019682	for
 <image-slac@lists1.slac.stanford.edu>; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:03:58 -0700
	(envelope-from stephenalewis@mac.com)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-67-164-34-254.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [67.164.34.254]) by asmtp015.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server
 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id
 <0L9M00C7BNNR3L90@asmtp015.mac.com> for image-slac@lists1.slac.stanford.edu;
 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Lewis <stephenalewis@mac.com>
To: "image-slac@lists1.slac.stanford.edu"
	<image-slac@lists1.slac.stanford.edu>
Sender: "owner-image-slac@slac.stanford.edu"
	<owner-image-slac@slac.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:02:15 -0700
Subject: Re: EVR and cameras
Thread-Topic: EVR and cameras
Thread-Index: Actho8tv3eULsYhISCSu7s+SD/l/zg==
Message-ID: <B674D8DE-57BF-409F-A9FA-CD600A10FADD@mac.com>
References: <4CA62676.8020703@slac.stanford.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4CA62676.8020703@slac.stanford.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: exch-hub1.win.slac.stanford.edu
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-authentication-warning: lists1.slac.stanford.edu: pmx4 set sender to
 owner-image-slac@slac.stanford.edu using -f
x-pmx-version: 5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data:
 2010.10.1.195414
x-pmx-spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05,
 BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1700_1799 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0,
 BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0,
 __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __C230066_P5 0,
 __CP_MEDIA_BODY 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0,
 __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0,
 __MSGID_APPLEMAIL 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0,
 __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT_APPLEMAIL 0, __X_MAILER_APPLEMAIL 0'
x-proofpoint-virus-version: vendor=fsecure
 engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000
 definitions=2010-10-01_09:2010-10-01,2010-10-01,1970-01-01 signatures=0
x-proofpoint-spam-details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0
 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1010010185
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

If all you require is a good TTL trigger than you don't need the EVR on the=
 same chassis.  However, if you want to use the BSA ('Beam Synchronous Acqu=
isition') technique (from Stephanie Allison) than you do, because the camer=
a records must be directly linked to the EVR records.  If the EVR and its r=
ecords are on a different machine, it doesn't work.  Even so, the TTL trigg=
er still really causes the camera to acquire the image.

MCC scientists use the BSA technique a lot; but if you are in a test facili=
ty maybe your end users do not.


On 1 Oct 2010, at 11:20 , Alison Chaiken wrote:

> Steve, in examining your attached slide, I'm wondering whether EVR cards =
must be plugged into the same chassis as framegrabbers or no.    Wise cowor=
kers have advised me that the same PCI bus must host both cards in order fo=
r the timing system to work properly, although if the camera gets a TTL tri=
gger from the EVR, it's not obvious to me that it's necessarily so.    I gu=
ess that the timing system pulses can be much more frequent than the camera=
 acquisition due to long exposures so that some care is necessary to figure=
 out which events result in initiation of an image acquisition, but I'm not=
 clear on whether there's something special about the two cards being on th=
e same PCI bus if a TTL trigger is still needed.    I'm still designing my =
system and am trying to understand what my architectural options are.   Tha=
nks!
>=20
> --=20
> Alison Chaiken				alison@slac.stanford.edu
> (650) 926-2755 [checked nearly never]	http://exerciseforthereader.org/
> I've got stacks in my structs, I've got arrays in my queues,
> I've got the segmentation-violation, core-dumped blues.
> -- Rick Moen
>=20
>=20
>=20
> <EVR_Camera_timing_LCLS.pdf>

