Present: Peter Bosted, Don Crabb, Keith Griffioen, Piotr Decowski,
         Bill Olson, John Weisend, Perry Anthony, Steve Rock


Target: Think ready for CRD next week. In Research Yard, on Tue.
morning. Reviewers lined up. Magnet will be built in U.K. Frank,
John, and Don plan to go out to U.K.: will need travel money. 

Target Irratidiation in ESA: would be nice (but not essentail). Would
want about 50 nA. Can be useful for LiD. Standord Campus linic
is going away. Helium dewer would be 10 to 20K (then irradiate
at Monterey, or at a food irradiation place, or high power
source). Perry asks, Can photon beam be used to irradiate target? 
Could be good idea! Rough estimate is that photon beam has 
enough power if something like 1 r.l. converter put in front
of target to generate about 1E9 elec/pos. pairs/spill. 

Electron beam may be useful for Polarimetry. Would it be useful
to limit to 1 Hz. If Compton Polarimeter works, then endpoint
region guaranteed to be same as electron polarization, so this
would only be needed in CP fails, in which case cannot measure
pol. vrs energy anyway, which is what is needed. Peter concludes
that we should not need electron beam for this purpose.


Beam: For steering photon beam, Peter suggest a sort of wire
array on front of jaws of photon collimator. This could be made
of lead with quartz fibers. Radiation damage could be an issue,
but will probbly be o.k.

Beam Simulations. Got new results from P. Grabmayr. Peter B. does
not understand some of the features. He is able to reproduce bump
near endpoint: he is working to incorporate this into experiment
design, so can measure at 35 GeV and 15 or 25 GeV simultaneously.
Armen Apyan is working on incorporating channeling into his code.

Reuirements: Peter B. finished long document on Experiment Requirements
(see T.N. 7). No comments yet.

Spectrometer: The above requirements doecument is proving useful
in spectrometer desing. The two viable alternates now seem to be
a) use D3 (plus perhaps an extra small dipole) or
b) make muon range telescope. Preliminary cost estimate shows this
   option to be quite expensive, and resolution may be too poor.

Simulations: Piotr mainly working on E158, but looked at Be as
an absorber: need 3 times more length than Alumina for similar
suppresion (he said 1.6 times in phone conf., but corrected this the
next day). We would need about 8 or 9 m. Will look at Graphite and
pure aluminum, and various combinations. 

Collabortion Meeting. A draft agenda has been posted: no-one had
any corrections.