******** E140 Ratio of F2A/F2d ********************************                 
-----From THESIS ALL on Whitlow's archives------------------------              
------Tables 4.2 and 4.3 from Whitlow's thesis-----------                       
                                                                                
\def\B{\phantom{:}}                                                             
                                                                                
\hidetab\dRtab={E140 iron/deuterium structure function comparisons}             
{Shown are the E140 iron/deuterium structure function comparisons.              
Uncertainties are fractional in \Ft\ and absolute in \R.  Systematic            
uncertainties are negligible, with the exception of normalization               
uncertainties in \Ffd\ and \Fad\ of \z1.0\% and \z2.6\%, respectively.          
More accurate estimates of \Ffd\ and \Fad\ are presented in Table 4.3.          
Also presented is the \Xdf\ of the regression analyses.}                        
{\vskip-.8cm\tablewidth=4.5in\columns=4\begintable                              
           \|                \|                \|\nr\msp\dbl                    
\B\x\b\b\b\Q\| \Ffd\b\z\dFST \|\P\Rfd\b\z\dRST \| \Xdf \dbl                     
Iron/Deuterium\|             \|                \|      \lnp                     
.20 \b 1.0 \|  1.013 \b .012 \| \M.064 \b .051 \| \p.9 \nr                      
.20 \b 1.5 \|  1.000 \b .013 \| \M.143 \b .056 \| \p.7 \nr                      
.20 \b 2.5 \|  1.070 \b .022 \| \P.148 \b .077 \|  1.2 \nr                      
.35 \b 1.5 \|  1.011 \b .016 \| \P.032 \b .078 \| \p.6 \nr                      
.35 \p 2.5 \|  1.018 \b .013 \| \P.095 \b .056 \|  1.0 \nr                      
.35 \b 5.0 \| \p.992 \b .016 \| \P.024 \b .058 \| \p.4 \nr                      
.50 \b 2.5 \| \p.939 \b .008 \| \P.018 \b .033 \| \p.8 \nr                      
.50 \b 5.0 \| \p.939 \b .013 \| \M.016 \b .052 \| \p.2 \lnp                     
Gold/Deuterium\|             \|                \|      \lnp                     
.20 \b 1.0 \|  1.018 \b .012 \| \M.045 \b .058 \| \p.4 \dbl                     
\msp\endtable}                                                                  
%-----------------------------------------------------------------------        
\hidetab\avgdRtab={E140 EMC effect ratios}{Shown are the E140 EMC effect        
ratios extracted by assuming \Rf\seq\Ra\seq\Rd.  Uncertainties are              
fractional.  Systematic uncertainties are negligible, with the exception        
of normalization uncertainties of \z1.0\% and \z2.6\% for \Ffd\ and             
\Fad, respectively.  Also shown are the \Xdf\ for the averagings over           
\eps.}{\vskip-.8cm\tablewidth=3.5in\columns=3\begintable                        
            \|                 \|\nr\msp\dbl                                    
\b\x\b\b\b\Q\|\AVGt{\Ffd}\sz\dFST\|\Xdf\dbl                                     
Iron/Deuterium\|               \|      \lnp                                     
.20 \b 1.0  \|  1.028 \b .005  \|  1.3 \nr                                      
.20 \b 1.5  \|  1.031 \b .004  \|  2.3 \nr                                      
.20 \b 2.5  \|  1.027 \b .006  \|  1.0 \nr                                      
.35 \b 1.5  \|  1.005 \b .006  \| \p.4 \nr                                      
.35 \p 2.5  \| \p.998 \b .005  \|  1.4 \nr                                      
.35 \b 5.0  \| \p.985 \b .005  \| \p.3 \nr                                      
.50 \b 2.5  \| \p.935 \b .005  \| \p.7 \nr                                      
.50 \b 5.0  \| \p.942 \b .006  \| \p.2 \lnp                                     
Gold/Deuterium\|               \|      \lnp                                     
.20 \b 1.0  \|  1.027 \b .005  \| \p.4 \dbl                                     
\msp\endtable}