Distribution: Bob Bell 41 Gordon Bowden 17 Pat Burchat 95 Hobey DeStaebler 17 Jonathan Dorfan 17 Stan Ecklund 17 F. Forti INFN-Pisa Fred Goozen LBL 50-137 John Hodgson 12 Roy Kerth LBL 50-340 Jim Krebs 41 Eddie Lin 26 Harvey Lynch 41 Tom Mattison 17 Martin Nordby 21 Jeff Richman UCSB Physics Dept. Natalie Roe LBL John Seeman 17 Mike Sullivan 17 Dieter Walz 20 Uli Wienands 17 M. Witherell UCSB Physics Dept. Bob Yamamoto LLNL L-287 Mike Zisman LBL Max Zolotorev 55 19 May 1995 To: Distribution: From: Stan Ecklund Subject: "IR +- 1m Engineering" Meeting Notes 19 May 1995 Dieter and Ron Rogers showed the latest water manifolds for the Be beam pipe. Instead of a vacuum flange, welded islets are proposed at each end just outboard of the manifold and a short bellows. Each islet can be cut apart and rewelded several times as needed. To avoid the problem of losing the epoxy corrosion protection layer, the outer Be layer could be epoxied in place after vacuum bake-out. Small 1/8" stainless tubing to feed the manifold is possible, causing a 16.7 PSI pressure drop. It does make it impossible to maintain the absolute pressure below one atmosphere, desirable from the standpoint of water spillage. Pressure drop in Be pipe is estimated to be 7.7 PSI and 15 PSI for misc. connections for a total of about 40 PSI. Dieter detailed considerations regarding cooling with Helium gas. He concludes that He cooling is not feasible for an assumed power deposition of 1 KW. Water in concentric Be pipes looks like the best option. Details in attached transparencies. John Hodgson report on heat and stress calculations in the B1 mask with 3 amps in the LER; previous results were for 2.1 amps. At the hot spot, there are 17.9 watts/mm in a 0.5 mm wide stripe. This gives a temperature rise is 140 deg C. and compressive stress of 34600 PSI. This can be improved by moving the water cooling channel closer to the heat source. The number of cycles of this stress is large, given that at injection, separating the beams will move the heat source. Glidcop is rated for 30,000 PSI at 10^7 cycles. We discussed the feasibility of using stronger materials, such as tungsten alloys and stainless) as a liner in the mask at the high heat deposition. We will see how the calculation looks with re configured cooling channels. Dave Coupal will report on shielding needs in two weeks. Action Items: 1. Find solution to Q1 interferences. [Martin, Stan, Mike,..] 2. Look for ways to reduce cable interferences. [Roy] 3. Consider ways to make B1 support smaller. [Martin] 4. Temperature Specifications for B1, Q1. [] 5. Update drawing: [Martin Nordby, Fred Goozen] Correct OD of support tube to be 43 cm (TDR value). Shielding, rotated BPM, Radial Ion pump,... 6. HOM RF calculations with new mask geometry. [Eddie Lin] 7. Check that a rotated BPM misses synchrotron rad fan. [Mike] 8. Maintain list of support tube parameters. [Hobey] add Q1 radii, offset, support barrel radii,... 9. Can we do with less shielding between B1 and Q1? [D. Coupal] 10. Refine Be cooling flow manifold, details. [Dieter] 11. Required thickness of Q1 containment. [Martin] 12. Mask cooling calculation. [J. Hodgson] No meeting next week 26 May 1995 Next Meeting: 13:00 Friday 2 June 1995 in the Yellow room with TV to LBL attachments: transparencies