SLAC PEP-II
BABAR
SLAC<->RAL
Babar logo
HEPIC E,S & H Databases PDG HEP preprints
Organization Detector Computing Physics Documentation
Personnel Glossary Sitemap Search Hypernews
Unwrap page!
Det. Search
Who's who?
Meetings
FAQ
Images
Archive
Systems
Performance
Intern. region
Vertex Tracker
Drift chamber
DIRC
Calorimeter
IFR
LST
Magnet
Electronics
Trigger
Operations
Run Coordination
Contact Experts
Shift Takers Info
Operations Manual
Electronic Logbook
Ops Hypernews
Shift Signup
Check this page for HTML 4.01 Transitional compliance with the
W3C Validator
(More checks...)

Trigger Operation Meeting (09/18/07)

Attendees: Rainer Bartoldus, Kim Hojeong, Selina Li, Rahmat Rahmat, Al Eisner.

Meeting Information

 Date      :  September 18, 2007
 Time      :  2:00pm - 3:30pm PST
 SLAC Room :  Madrone conf room, ROB 
 
 Dial-in   :  1-510-665-5437, pass code 6649#

--- Minutes ---

Operations/EMT

  • On 09/13, Mark updated EMC UPS serial number reference file, and performed EMT Calibration at IR2. It was successful.

DQM

  • Rahmat will add (L3 lumi)/(mu pair number) and comparing to B counting number into the strip charts.

Statistics Survey

  • main web page
  • 5 stages of emergency configurations: 0(default), 1, 2, 3, 4
  • The differences:
  • Swagato's tau->e(mu)nu:
    • electron mode: 1->2 (G*) shows bigger effect for this mode. 2->3 (adding Zk)\ is safer change.
    • muon mode: 3->4 (3M&M*) shows big effect for pure EMT lines. G* doesn't help for this mode.
  • Selina's 2 photon->pipi:
    • 2 photon->pi0pi0: 1->2, 3->4 costs 3~4%. Others don't affect efficiency.
    • 2 photon->pi+pi-: 1->2, 3->4 shows small effect. But 3M&M* depends on background and not reliable, killing G* is also not reliable, and putting Zk change too small. Is Zk simulation done realistically? At stage 4, what gives over 40% pure EMT efficiency?
  • B->nu nubar (gamma):
    • B->nu nubar: 3->4 shows 6% efficiency drop in 3->4. In 2->3 (Zk) pure DCT and Mixed has some effect. The overall efficiency is not affected much since EMT is not changed, but in terms of orthogonality, it has effect. Since 3->4 makes a big change, it's good that it's at the last.
  • Order of stages may need to be changed.
    • 1E is first to go (stage 0.5)
    • Either 1 or 3 should be the first stage. These will be tight configuration (need to confirm, tight configuration may also has Zk).
    • For emergency, 2 then 4.
    • An example order: (1E line)->(3: add Zk)->(1: kill prescaled lines)->(2: G*)->(4: 3M&M*)

AOB

  • We will continue discuss some more modes during collaboration meeting.
  • Haiwen has conflict with other meeting. Unfortunately we concluded we can't change time. He can attend T/F/L AWG meeting.

This page was created by Kim Hojeong; however, you are welcome to edit and/or correct above items, specially for those who attended the meeting. Thanks.

Last Modified: September 18, 2007.